I have ADHD, which to avoid boredom, “tells” me to do more risky things. Is it a surprise that life expectancy is lowered with higher risk? And that the ADHD medication lowers the risky bits therefore increasing life expectancy?
Question to my fellow ADHDers who take the meds, is fun still fun and happening? or has calmness become the new fun?
You may have the Hyperactive-Impulsive presentation (or the Combined one), which is relatively rare among adults. I have the other one of the three (Inattentive), and I wouldn't say it raises my impulsivity, though I guess it's hard to know. The meds literally saved my life and career, but I also almost exclusively take them when working or in lowkey social situations so it's hard to say what they might do when, like, rock climbing or whitewater boating or something.
I suppose impulsivity in terms of working on what I should be working on instead of going into some rabbit hole is a type of impulsivity, and that's certainly decreased! I wouldn't call the former state "fun" though... more like "shameful", "irrational", and "distressing". Personally -- YMMV.
Anyway: yes that's plausible, as this review found pretty strong evidence of increased mortality from injury. Still, I'd personally say it's unlikely for two major reasons:
1. Presumably most injury deaths happen to adults, which are relatively quite unlikely to have the HI presentation.
2. There's just so many plausible causes of injuries, especially in a society with cars. The inclusion of "intentional injury" also introduces a factor that's no doubt strongly corellated with socioeconomic status (i.e. being murdered/manslaughtered), another very plausible cause.
As a person with severe ADHD, who has never taken any medication, I find this study troubling. It uses statistical correlation to indicate causation.
People on ADHD medicine are also going through mental health treatments and get special care and privileges in society. At the same time, the effects of ADHD medication numb their responses and emotions to what seems outwardly stable and normal but deep inside it is an inhibitor of development.
So excuse me for saying so, but I don’t buy into the conclusions of this study at all.
The other problem with the study is that it does not take income into consideration. This is my largest pet peeve with so many studies, they're basically ignoring a major indicator of quality of life and then make weird conclusions.
Well, you've made some incorrect assumptions. You seem to think yourself verysmart, so you should understand a snap judgement like this is worth very little. You don't need psychological treatment alongside it and the results are pretty obvious and immediate. Try it or don't, but I have trouble seeing the value in your narrow and uninformed opinion.
No offence, but how do you know what the effect of the medication is, if you've never taken it? Your description doesn't match my experience.
I'm unsure about the inhibitor of development bit also, do you mean physiological, intellectual, emotional... ...software?
Are you able to clarify what special care and privileges are you thinking of? I have seen a psychologist a few times, but I can't afford to do so nearly as much as I need to.
I mean, does it though...? The strongest claim they make is that "timely diagnosis and treatment" (via medication) "may reduce the risk", which seems like a pretty indisputable statement based on the observed corellations.
Anyway, as a side note:
People on ADHD medicine are also going through mental health treatments and get special care and privileges in society
I mean technically yeah, but the vast, vast majority of psychiatric medication management relationships don't involve therapy. Still more likely to pursue it though, I agree. Is that a bad thing, though? Absent of evidence pharmacological treatment doesn't help, this feels like a time we can just recommend and embrace both.
the effects of ADHD medication numb their responses and emotions to what seems outwardly stable and normal but deep inside it is an inhibitor of development
Your musings are not at all based in science, but instead personal anxieties. That's fine for you, but please don't casually muse about the secret nature of lifesaving clinical treatments, especially the treatment that is possibly the most stigmatized yet effective treatment in our society (after PrEP, I suppose).
> This review also showed a significant association between ADHD medication use and reduced rates of all-cause mortality in people with ADHD.
Can someone let the fine fellows at the DEA know this so they can knock it off with being stupidly strict with the manufacture of the stimulant medications?
Question to my fellow ADHDers who take the meds, is fun still fun and happening? or has calmness become the new fun?
I suppose impulsivity in terms of working on what I should be working on instead of going into some rabbit hole is a type of impulsivity, and that's certainly decreased! I wouldn't call the former state "fun" though... more like "shameful", "irrational", and "distressing". Personally -- YMMV.
Anyway: yes that's plausible, as this review found pretty strong evidence of increased mortality from injury. Still, I'd personally say it's unlikely for two major reasons:
1. Presumably most injury deaths happen to adults, which are relatively quite unlikely to have the HI presentation.
2. There's just so many plausible causes of injuries, especially in a society with cars. The inclusion of "intentional injury" also introduces a factor that's no doubt strongly corellated with socioeconomic status (i.e. being murdered/manslaughtered), another very plausible cause.
People on ADHD medicine are also going through mental health treatments and get special care and privileges in society. At the same time, the effects of ADHD medication numb their responses and emotions to what seems outwardly stable and normal but deep inside it is an inhibitor of development.
So excuse me for saying so, but I don’t buy into the conclusions of this study at all.
1. How could you know ADHD medication numb their responses if you've never taken meds?
2. I hope you have the live you deserve. You seem like a happy person.
I'm unsure about the inhibitor of development bit also, do you mean physiological, intellectual, emotional... ...software?
Are you able to clarify what special care and privileges are you thinking of? I have seen a psychologist a few times, but I can't afford to do so nearly as much as I need to.
Anyway, as a side note:
I mean technically yeah, but the vast, vast majority of psychiatric medication management relationships don't involve therapy. Still more likely to pursue it though, I agree. Is that a bad thing, though? Absent of evidence pharmacological treatment doesn't help, this feels like a time we can just recommend and embrace both. Your musings are not at all based in science, but instead personal anxieties. That's fine for you, but please don't casually muse about the secret nature of lifesaving clinical treatments, especially the treatment that is possibly the most stigmatized yet effective treatment in our society (after PrEP, I suppose).Can someone let the fine fellows at the DEA know this so they can knock it off with being stupidly strict with the manufacture of the stimulant medications?
I'm sure this will be fine and you really have nothing to worry about.