4 comments

  • debarshri 2 hours ago
    I dont this is top most priority. We do this with codex or claude in chrome and validate the UX.

    I think BDD is going to be back in style for agent generate code.

    When you generate at scale discovering, maintaining and scaling test is the major problem, thats why were katana [1] a behavior driven testinf utility thay discovers behavior and maintain, generates test cases.

    [1] https://github.com/adaptive-scale/katana

    • canergl 1 hour ago
      cool project but, It's not always code that's broken. Imagine you have a discrepancy in DB level that ends up with an error in frontend.

      You always need real QA tests to ensure things are working smoothly.

  • ramoz 1 hour ago
    "It reads the screen, not the DOM", but is built completely on Playwright? At first it made me think you have some visual model at play, but doesn't actually seem that way.
    • canergl 1 hour ago
      yes, It uses gemini vision models on top of playwright
  • rgbrgb 2 hours ago
    CI with regular e2e tests usually gets pretty expensive and slow. How does cost compare to regular playwright tests?
    • canergl 1 hour ago
      Argus adds one more layer onto Playwright, so we expect it to be slower. Think of it as a kind of tradeoff where you gain human-level QA by accepting slower runs.
  • qqrun 1 hour ago
    We built something like this haha
    • canergl 1 hour ago
      can you share with us if It's public?