Migrating from Proxmox to NixOS and Incus

(nijho.lt)

22 points | by wasting_time 2 hours ago

5 comments

  • iotapi322 3 minutes ago
    I've been using incus for a while now and actually run it on a side project in production for the better part of a year. Rock solid performance.
  • EnigmaCurry 42 minutes ago
    NixOS has transformed my use of Proxmox. I configure, build, and deploy everything from my nix workstation. I don't need to use the PVE gui at all. Proxmox is just a target, and I've abstracted things enough to where I can deploy the same machines to libvirt on a local machine too. Why would I need to let my agent into my PVE box? I haven't looked at incus, but if I wanted to run the full stack declaratively, nixos and LLMs are so powerful now that I would probably just say to run libvirt and ZFS on nixos natively.
  • cassianoleal 1 hour ago
    I'm also considering migrating from Proxmox to Incus, but I'd look into IncusOS rather than having to manage the host OS myself.
    • agartner 52 minutes ago
      I'm a big LXD and now Incus fan. But I went with NixOS rather than IncusOS for my latest build because I prefer the LTS linux kernel over the mainline kernel.
  • kennywinker 39 minutes ago
    > But fundamentally, Proxmox is built around clicking buttons. It is a GUI-first paradigm.

    Uhh, whut? It provides a button-y interface, but you can do everything via config files and `pct` on the command line if you prefer. I know that’s not full nix-style declarative, but you don’t have to mislead to sell me on the advantages of declarative infra.

  • Rekindle8090 27 minutes ago
    [dead]